Nelson Hardiman successfully obtained a writ of attachment in excess of $400,000 against Los Angeles Metropolitan Medical Center (LAMMC). The proceedings followed months of negotiations during which Nelson Hardiman had attempted to persuade LAMMC to honor payment obligations to Nelson Hardiman’s client, an organization formerly contracted to the hospital. When negotiations broke down, Nelson Hardiman lawyers sued on behalf of the client and sought a writ seeking seizure of hospital assets. The Los Angeles Superior Court agreed that the client was entitled to provisional relief by writ of attachment.
Posted on February 4, 2010
Recent Posts
Hacking and Healing: Nation-States, Cyber Attacks, and Healthcare LawReproductive Rights Attorney: This Is Why Right-Wing Interest Are Attempting To Ban MifepristoneDecades in the Making: 42 CFR Part 2’s Transformation After 50 YearsHarry Nelson on Forbes News: Impact of the Alabama Supreme Court’s Frozen Embryo RulingCalifornia’s Corporate Healthcare Law, Practice of Medicine (CPOM)