From the article:
When providers try to appeal adverse benefit determinations to the administrators of health and benefit plans governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), all too often the response to the appeal is simply non-informative. It is not unusual for a provider’s appeal to be met with a form letter containing no more than a sentence or two that the original benefit determination is being upheld because “benefits were paid in accordance with plan terms,” or some similarly vague statement. This rarely assists providers in understanding the basis for the benefit determination because provider often do not know the plan terms.
Posted on August 1, 2010
Recent Posts
Wander Management in Senior Care: Lessons From the Brookfield Assisted Living SettlementHarry Nelson Interviewed on NPR: With telehealth abortion, doctors have to learn to trust and empower patients8 Nelson Hardiman Attorneys Named to the 2023 Southern California Super Lawyers ListClient Alert: Cannabis Businesses Can Use Writ of Attachment to Expedite CollectionsClient Alert- A Priority Regulatory Update: Physicians to Provide Mandatory Notice to Patients About Payments Received From Manufacturers of Drugs or Medical Equipment